Naked truths about Sherlyn Chopra

Posted by Krunal Jalora Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:54 PM


She has gone naked, and continuously so, in the last one 30 days. She is apparently the first Native indian to function in the talked about Playboy journal magazine. She is seen perfectly status with the press Mogul, Hugh Hefner. 

Say hello to the present babe, Sherlyn Chopra. After having a blink-and-miss performance in about ten movies and three facilities collections to her credit, Sherlyn Chopra has lastly came onto the newspaper landscape of not just Native indian, but world-wide press boards. 

Hot Sherlyn Chopra 
Sherlyn Chopra, blessed in Hyderabad twenty six years ago, increased to popularity in the beginning 2000s with her activities in several small funds, A-certified movies. 

She appeared in movies like Dosti: Buddies Forever(2005), Sexy Boy(2006), Game(2007), Red Swastik(2007) to name a few. 

Her epidermis display, ready-to-pounce sex attraction, smutty erectile moments made her the 'bold' acting professional with a hot body and a noisy lips.

Sherlyn Chopra Hot Photos


She has been non-chalant about her libido and its concept. 


She arrived a side-role in an A-lister, Yash Raj Movies development, Dil Bole Hadippa last year. In this film also, more than the performing expertise of Sherlyn Chopra, we saw her enjoying a seductress with falling cleavage lines, limited dresses and brazilian bikinis. 

She was enjoying the picture she had designed for herself- raw and sexy, but well, she was enjoying herself in a YRF film. Everyone believed that was her big crack, and lastly, she had came in Bollywood. 

Another small stint in Great Manager 3 last year and we all believed that Sherlyn Chopra is the new celebrity to look at out for. But then she disappeared for many years. New women was released. Stunners like Rakhi Sawant, Veena Malik and the more latest Poonam Pandey and SunnyLeone hogged the focus with new-age sexual movies and enticing product figures and truth reveals.

Nudity has become the new catch-phrase. Where one design statements to remove if this and that happens, another one conceals her personal areas on the photographic camera, providing us near-nude images. Everyone is trying at bare skin in their own way. It is about getting that highlight, basking in that popularity and becoming the hot-topic.

Cut to 2012. On a boring September night, when people are finding yourself their workplaces and going home, one lady changes the experience.

Sherlyn Chopra declares her photoshoot with the popular Playboy journal magazine. She twitter posts images with the Playboy journal monarch Hugh Hefner, appearing cosily with him in his house. 

The statement was followed by controversial, naked images, which were, in a bit, eliminated from the public media site. 

Sherlyn Chopra has handled to hog the focus on public media and conventional media for over three several weeks now.


It was formal. Sherlyn Chopra was naked, and now she was popular. She did what her competitors were ambitious to do. 


She views herself the freed Native indian lady, who is not shy to exhibit her system, ideas and libido. She talks as she believes. In a latest twitter, she said, 'Thanks 2 all those who have praised my choice 2 b free-spirited n 2 do with my lifestyle what I please 2 do.I'm responsible 2 no one but myself.'

In a latest media meeting, on being inquired about her Playboy journal capture, she aid, 'there is a distinction between a adult celebrity and a Playboy journal lady. Everyone knows there is a distinction between appearing naked at the front side of a moving photographic camera and having sex at the front side of one. And well, I have only taken the first step until now.'(sic) She begins sniggering after the ideas.


She carries on, 'this is my lifestyle, my system and my work. This is not a local journal, it is the world-famous Playboy journal.'(sic)

I am still remaining with my query, is bare skin the admission to fame? Is the value of an performing professional identified by how beginning the performing professional strips?

In this case, the response seems to be yes.